A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving prospective neighbours more than the development of the wall at a coastal web-site within a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes attracted countrywide interest subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household residence at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of arranging breaches, environmental considerations, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations short article about René Collier along with the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has developed right into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a business director respectively, seek out to create their spouse and children home. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming created by their future neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those residents of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their scheduling authorization by creating a wall outside of the boundaries in their web site, leading to an encroachment on a Particular Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as such regions are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a delicate coastal ecosystem for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their organizing permission, and say the wall, that's partly constructed, is in the correct placement. Their lawful group has characterised the motion as an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to maintain their see, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal organizing disputes, where by views of the sea are each remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-high drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions, an image which has because grow to be emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These steps weren't simply symbolic; they had been meant to gather Visible evidence in the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Times noted, describing how The 2 men entered the water throughout critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location turned Just about the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely famous that this kind of actions were being cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately through the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as readers sought to grasp the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second inside the legal timeline.
At the Main from the dispute is actually a disagreement around boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain which the wall, as made, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has become called meticulous in his examination of preparing documents, maps, and disorders attached towards the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is inspired by issue for environmental protection and adherence to planning law. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A personal watch, insisting as an alternative that it is about making sure that enhancement at René Collier and Paul Feely Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got explained their very long-standing link to the area and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair basically attempting to make a family residence in accordance With all the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches on the Specific Spot of Conservation and say that each one performs are completed based upon professional assistance and authorised strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as moving into The ocean for the duration of a storm, do not alter the fundamental specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal internet site happens to be a shorthand description for just a situation a large number of observers see as increasingly frequent. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Instances write-up about René Collier mentioned the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from extremely various Experienced backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, have become synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-significant drinking water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments and René Collier waded by way of midsection-significant water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both the physical truth from the coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an excessive approach.
As being the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome stays uncertain. The courtroom ought to figure out whether the wall as created complies with planning authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Area of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and scheduling ailments. But the human ingredient remains central: neighbours who have to Are living alongside each other extended once the legal expenditures have already been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building works at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation increase over and above that tackle. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the significance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. It also underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when essential challenges for example environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a location of natural elegance and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre of the dispute stands partly constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal concerns. No matter if it will ultimately be altered, eliminated, or completed as prepared will depend upon the court’s conclusions. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably carry on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to The most intently viewed arranging disputes in north Dublin in recent times.